Castle Connolly Top Doctor
Westerville Sleep Center Mahmoud Qadoom, MD · Sleep & Pulmonary Medicine (614) 898-9340

Other conditions

Snoring vs sleep apnea: when snoring is a warning sign

Mahmoud Qadoom, MD 6 min read

Typographic title card for Snoring vs sleep apnea: when snoring is a warning sign

Primary snoring means snoring after obstructive sleep apnea has been ruled out. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, not a sound you can name from the hallway. A sleep physician makes that call. A dentist does not. Drugstore strips, sprays, and boil-and-bite guards are not a workup. If the question is whether the noise is a warning, the next step is evaluation and, when indicated, a sleep test, not another product from the checkout aisle.

Why is primary snoring a diagnosis of exclusion?

The noise of snoring is vibration of upper-airway tissue. Obstructive sleep apnea is repeated collapse of that airway with drops in airflow, oxygen, or both, and with arousals. The same anatomy can produce either picture. Clinical symptoms cannot reliably separate them. Loud snoring is common in apnea. The absence of a witnessed pause does not rule apnea out. Reviews of primary snoring (including a CADTH-era clinical review) treat “snoring without OSA” as a conclusion you reach after testing or after a structured decision that testing is not indicated, not as something you hear.

Research papers do not even share one AHI cutoff. De Meyer and colleagues, in a 2019 systematic review of definitions, found that operational thresholds for “primary snoring” vary, often AHI under 5 per hour, sometimes up to under 15. That inconsistency is a reason not to self-label from a wearable’s nightly score. The conceptual definition used in practice is snoring without sleep apnea (and, in older papers, without upper-airway resistance syndrome). You get there by excluding OSA, not by deciding the snore “sounds benign.”

This article is about that fork in the road: warning versus exclusion. The clinic’s snoring condition page covers treatment options in more depth once the diagnosis is actually made. Do not skip the fork.

Who is supposed to diagnose this, the physician or the dentist?

The 2015 AASM and AADSM oral-appliance guideline (Ramar and colleagues) is explicit in the values-and-trade-offs section for primary snoring: diagnosis of primary snoring should be rendered by a sleep physician and not a dentist, because snoring is frequently accompanied by OSA, and misdiagnosis can have serious implications for the patient.

That sentence exists because a quieter snore is not a safer airway. A custom oral appliance can reduce snoring intensity and frequency. The same guideline gives that a STANDARD recommendation versus no therapy, for adults who request treatment of primary snoring without OSA, usually after conservative measures (weight loss, positional therapy, avoiding alcohol) fail or the patient wants more. Custom, titratable devices are preferred over non-custom ones when an appliance is used for OSA. None of that relocates the diagnosis into a dental chair. The dentist’s job starts after a physician has named the problem.

If a dental office offers a snore guard without a sleep-physician diagnosis, that sequence contradicts the 2015 CPG. Neighboring practices sometimes market oral appliances as the front-line answer to snoring. The joint guideline’s order is: physician diagnosis, conservative care, then an appliance for primary snoring if you still want treatment. For OSA, the same CPG recommends oral appliances when the patient is intolerant of CPAP or prefers an alternative, not as a silent substitute for finding out whether apnea is present.

When is snoring a warning sign rather than a nuisance?

Snoring plus sleepiness, gasping or choking, known hypertension, or obesity is a testing indication in ordinary sleep-medicine practice, sitting on top of the 2017 AASM diagnostic-testing guideline (Kapur and colleagues). Adults with concern for OSA after a comprehensive sleep evaluation should be tested. In-lab polysomnography is the standard diagnostic test. A home sleep apnea test with a technically adequate device is an option for uncomplicated adults at increased risk of moderate-to-severe OSA. Both are physician-ordered. The AASM’s home-testing position is that HSAT is not a retail screen.

Isolated quiet snoring in a low-risk person is a softer call. The 2017 CPG does not invent a decibel threshold that mandates a study. It also does not say “snoring for a year” is automatically a test. Clinical judgment still operates. Because primary snoring is an exclusion diagnosis, a bed partner who wants the noise treated, or a patient who wants an appliance, may still need evaluation so that OSA is not missed. That is not the same as a doorway rule that every snorer in Delaware County must spend a night in the lab.

A home test can underestimate severity compared with polysomnography. A negative or technically inadequate home study in a symptomatic snorer does not mean “you only snore.” The next step may be an in-lab night. Details of how those nights run live on the sleep testing page. The point here is narrower: the test is how you tell warning from nuisance. The strip is not.

Why are drugstore strips and sprays not a workup?

They do not measure apnea. They do not exclude apnea. They do not produce a physician diagnosis of primary snoring. At best they are an attempt to change the noise. A 2004 randomized home trial by Michaelson and O’Connor (40 people) found no objective or subjective snoring benefit from an OTC snore spray, a nasal strip, or a snore pillow versus no aid, using acoustic analysis and questionnaires. That is one protocol and three products, not a 2026 sweep of the entire aisle. It is enough to say that a negative night on a strip does not complete an evaluation, and a quieter night on a strip does not mean OSA is gone.

Nasal dilator strips and internal stents have been pooled in later systematic reviews that did not find a significant difference versus control in AHI or snoring index as monotherapy for sleep-disordered breathing. Even if a later device claims a small nasal-congestion benefit, that is still an adjunct conversation, not a substitute for deciding whether you have obstructive sleep apnea. Boil-and-bite mandibular “snore guards” are not the custom titratable appliances the 2015 CPG prefers. Chin straps are not an AASM-recommended therapy for OSA. Throat sprays are not guideline therapy.

Spending money in that aisle is understandable. Using the receipt as evidence that you “already treated it” is the error. If OSA is present, treating the sound and leaving the apnea is not treatment of OSA. PAP treats snoring that is part of OSA by treating the OSA. That is a prescription device, not a gadget.

What should you actually do with the noise?

If you snore and you are sleepy, gasp, have hard-to-control blood pressure, or have been told you stop breathing, schedule a sleep evaluation. If you snore and you want the noise treated, still start with a physician visit so that “primary snoring” is a real diagnosis. Conservative measures named in the 2015 CPG are weight loss, positional therapy, and avoiding alcohol. Those are not a promise of a quieter night. They are the first attempt the guideline names before an oral appliance for primary snoring.

The visit itself is a history, a look at the airway, a medication and alcohol review, and a decision about testing. CADTH’s 2010 overview of snoring versus OSA diagnosis is blunt on two points that still matter: it is difficult to tell primary snoring from OSA from symptoms alone, and a diagnosis of snoring is made when OSA (and, in that older terminology, upper-airway resistance syndrome) has been ruled out. The same review cites Ghegan and colleagues’ meta-analysis: portable monitors ran about 10 percent lower on respiratory-disturbance index than lab studies. That is the same undercount the 2017 AASM testing guideline still warns about. Questionnaires help prioritize. They do not finish the exclusion.

Do not mail a description of your snoring through a website form. Call (614) 898-9340 during weekday hours. The appointment is how you find out whether the snore is a warning. The drugstore cannot do that job, and neither can a dental impression taken before anyone has excluded apnea. If you already have a study that showed snoring without meeting OSA criteria, bring that report. Primary snoring is then a real diagnosis, and the oral-appliance conversation can start from the 2015 CPG rather than from a guess.

Sources

  1. Ramar K, Dort LC, Katz SG, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliance therapy: an update for 2015. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(7):773–827. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4481062/
  2. Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for diagnostic testing for adult obstructive sleep apnea: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(3):479–504.
  3. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. AASM releases position statement on home sleep apnea testing. https://aasm.org/aasm-releases-position-statement-home-sleep-apnea-testing/
  4. De Meyer MMD, Jacquet W, Vanderveken OM, Marks LAM. Systematic review of the different aspects of primary snoring. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;45:105–112.
  5. Michaelson PG, O’Connor PD. The effectiveness of over-the-counter snoring aids: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(6):649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.11.008
  6. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Diagnosis of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review of the accuracy. CADTH Technol Overv. 2010;1(1):e0108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3411139/
  7. Ghegan MD, Angelos PC, Stonebraker AC, Gillespie MB. Laboratory versus portable sleep studies: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(6):859–864. (as cited in CADTH 2010)
Mon to Fri 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Call (614) 898-9340